The Google Jagger Update

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg This

What has the Google Jagger update delivered to us as internet users and how has it impacted search engine optimization companies?

Jagger Update For Internet Users

The Google Jagger update was done to try and refine some of the results that were showing up in the Google search results by concentrating on weeding out those sites that were not beneficial to the person searching for their specific search term.

Google, and any search engine for that matter, wants to deliver high quality unique and relevant sites. That means that they needed to target scraper sites, monetized directory sites, spam sites, link exchanges and Blog spam.

With the completion of the Google Jagger update you should now see more relevant search engine results that are more likely to be in line with your requirements. Less rubbish and more good content was the hope and it seems that to a certain degree this update has been effective and was beneficial in general to the internet user whose preference is Google for their search engine.

Jagger Update For Search Engine Optimization Companies

After much wailing and gnashing of teeth SEO companies are starting to calm down….a little bit anyway. The Google Jagger update was deemed to be the end for search engine optimization companies and there was panic everywhere especially in the early stages of the update when sites seemed to be dropping like flies out of the Google results pages.

You could here the shouts of “they have gone too far this time” and “people will start using MSN & Yahoo! more and more now” any it is open to interpretation just whether these two statements hold some truth. One thing is certain though and that is that Google had to do something, too many black hat ‘SEO companies’ were abusing the previous algorithms and negatively affecting the overall quality of the Google search results.

Google created this monster initially by putting so much weight on inbound links and it was a relatively easy strategy for SEO companies to use that exploited how Google was producing results. Instantly there came wave after wave of irrelevant link farms whose sole purpose was to exploit the Google algorithms, it benefited nobody except the site owner who got away with it and many sites did…..then along came Jagger.

The Jagger update seems to affect the way SEO companies need to work by giving more weight to the relevancy of inbound and outbound links, filtering of unacceptable css spam techniques and demotion of blog relevancy/weight.

Instead of thinking of quantity over quality we have now got to be smarter, just like in real life a recommendation (link) from a high quality company (site) is more beneficial and trustworthy to you (your website) than that from an general ad lost in the classifieds section of a tabloid (think link farms).

It seems that SEO companies have got to now be more than manipulators; they have got to play more by the rules.

Search is ever evolving and so already there are people who are exploiting loopholes in the Jagger update but they are next in Google’s hit list…..may the battle commence!

website designing delhi,website designing india,website designing,website design,websitedesignin.org,seo,search engine optimization,seo articels,website design delhi,website design india

Writing Effective ALT Text For Images

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponSave on DeliciousDigg This

Writing Effective ALT Text For Images

Anyone who knows anything about web accessibility knows that images need alternative, or ALT, text assigned to them. This is because screen readers can’t understand images, but rather read aloud the alternative text assigned to them. In Internet Explorer we can see this ALT text, simply by mousing over the image and looking at the yellow tooltip that appears. Other browsers (correctly) don’t do this. The HTML for inserting ALT text is:

But surely there can’t be a skill to writing ALT text for images? You just pop a description in there and you’re good to go, right? Well, kind of. Sure, it’s not rocket science, but there are a few guidelines you need to follow…

Spacer images and missing ALT text

Spacer images should always be assigned null ALT text, or alt=”" . This way most screen readers will completely ignore the image and won’t even announce its presence. Spacer images are invisible images that pretty most websites use. The purpose of them is, as the name suggests, to create space on the page. Sometimes it’s not possible to create the visual display you need, so you can stick an image in (specifying its height and width) and volià, you have the extra space you need.

Not everyone uses this null ALT text for spacer images. Some websites stick in alt=”spacer image”. Imagine how annoying this can be for a screen reader user, especially when you have ten of them in a row. A screen reader would say, �Image, spacer image� ten times in a row (screen readers usually say the word, �Image�, before reading out its ALT text) – now that isn’t helpful!

Other web developers simply leave out the ALT attribute for spacer images (and perhaps other images). In this case, most screen readers will read out the filename, which could be �newsite/images/onepixelspacer.gif’. A screen reader would announce this image as �Image, newsite slash images slash one pixel spacer dot gif�. Imagine what this would sound like if there were ten of these in a row!

Bullets and icons

Bullets and icons should be treated in much the same way as spacer images, so should be assigned null alternative text, or alt=”". Think about a list of items with a fancy bullet proceeding each item. If the ALT text, �Bullet’ is assigned to each image then, �Image, bullet� will be read aloud by screen readers before each list item, making it take that bit longer to work through the list.

Icons, usually used to complement links, should also be assigned alt=”". Many websites, which place the icon next to the link text, use the link text as the ALT text of the icon. Screen readers would first announce this ALT text, and then the link text, so would then say the link twice, which obviously isn’t necessary.

(Ideally, bullets and icons should be called up as background images through the CSS document – this would remove them from the HTML document completely and therefore remove the need for any ALT description.)

Decorative images

Decorative images too should be assigned null alternative text, or alt=”". If an image is pure eye candy then there’s no need for a screen reader user to even know it’s there and being informed of its presence simply adds to the noise pollution.

Conversely, you could argue that the images on your site create a brand identity and by hiding them from screen reader users you’re denying this group of users the same experience. Accessibility experts tend to favour the former argument, but there certainly is a valid case for the latter too.

Navigation & text embedded within images

Navigation menus that require fancy text have no choice but to embed the text within an image. In this situation, the ALT text shouldn’t be used to expand on the image. Under no circumstances should the ALT text say, �Read all about our fantastic services, designed to help you in everything you do’. If the menu item says, �Services’ then the ALT text should also say �Services’. ALT text should always describe the content of the image and should repeat the text word-for-word. If you want to expand on the navigation, such as in this example, you can use the title attribute.

The same applies for any other text embedded within an image. The ALT text should simply repeat, word-for-word, the text contained within that image.

(Unless the font being used is especially unique it’s often unnecessary to embed text within images – advanced navigation and background effects can now be achieved with CSS.)

Company logo

Websites tend to vary in how they apply ALT text to logos. Some say, �Company name’, others �Company name logo’, and other describe the function of the image (usually a link back to the homepage), �Back to home’. Remember, ALT text should always describe the content of the image so the first example, alt=”Company name”, is probably the best. If the logo is a link back to the homepage then this can be effectively communicated through the title tag.

Conclusion

Writing effective ALT text isn’t too difficult. If it’s a decorative image then null alternative text, or alt=”" should usually be used – never, ever omit the ALT attribute. If the image contains text then the ALT text should simply repeat this text, word-for-word. Remember, ALT text should describe the content of the image and nothing more.

Do also be sure also to keep ALT text as short and succinct as possible. Listening to a web page with a screen reader takes a lot longer than traditional methods, so don’t make the surfing experience painful for screen reader users with bloated and unnecessary ALT text.

website designing delhi,website designing india,website designing,website design,websitedesignin.org,seo,search engine optimization,seo articels,website design delhi,website design india
website designing delhi,website designing india,website designing,website design,websitedesignin.org,seo,search engine optimization,seo articels,website design delhi,website design india